Calling 2020 for Entropy

User avatar
Pham Nuwen
Posts: 8985
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 02:17

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Pham Nuwen »

thoreau wrote: 21 Nov 2020, 19:19 The Trumpistanis are holding a rally at an intersection in my neighborhood. While stopped at a red light I rolled down my window and told them to go back to Russia.
You showed them.
Goddamn libertarian message board. Hugh Akston

leave me to my mescaline smoothie in peace, please. dhex
User avatar
Jennifer
Posts: 26254
Joined: 28 Apr 2010, 14:03

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Jennifer »

Here in Georgia, things have been more insane than usual: the two GOP senators have nagged the GOP Sec of State to resign, solely because said SoS keeps insisting Biden won the state fair and square. (At least once, post-election, he also said that Trump likely WOULD have won the state, had he not urged his supporters to forgo mail-in or absentee voting.)

So apparently, at least some Georgian MAGAts on Parler are threatening to sit out the upcoming senatorial runoff election, to punish the state GOP for giving the state to Biden.

https://www.newsweek.com/georgia-trump- ... fs-1549245
"Myself, despite what they say about libertarians, I think we're actually allowed to pursue options beyond futility or sucking the dicks of the powerful." -- Eric the .5b
User avatar
Aresen
Posts: 17457
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 20:18
Location: Great White Pacific Northwest

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Aresen »

Jennifer wrote: 21 Nov 2020, 20:31 Here in Georgia, things have been more insane than usual: the two GOP senators have nagged the GOP Sec of State to resign, solely because said SoS keeps insisting Biden won the state fair and square. (At least once, post-election, he also said that Trump likely WOULD have won the state, had he not urged his supporters to forgo mail-in or absentee voting.)

So apparently, at least some Georgian MAGAts on Parler are threatening to sit out the upcoming senatorial runoff election, to punish the state GOP for giving the state to Biden.

https://www.newsweek.com/georgia-trump- ... fs-1549245
Let it be said that, as libertarians, we support the right of any individual to take action (or in this case, refuse to take action) in a way that does not infringe the rights of others.
If Trump supporters wanted a tough guy, why did they elect such a whiny bitch? - Mo

Those who know history are doomed to deja vu. - the innominate one

Never bring a knife to a joke fight" - dhex
User avatar
thoreau
Posts: 30666
Joined: 06 May 2010, 12:56
Location: Back to the lab again

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by thoreau »

I would add that we support their right to take the medical advice that Trump gave in that famous April press conference.
"saying 'socialism' where normies can hear it is wrapping a bunch of barbed wire around a bat, handing the bat to the GOP, and standing with your head in the strike zone."
--Lunchstealer
User avatar
D.A. Ridgely
Posts: 20610
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 17:09
Location: The Other Side

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by D.A. Ridgely »

Mmmm... I'd kinda like one of Georgia's senators to be on Team Red.
User avatar
thoreau
Posts: 30666
Joined: 06 May 2010, 12:56
Location: Back to the lab again

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by thoreau »

D.A. Ridgely wrote: 21 Nov 2020, 20:39 Mmmm... I'd kinda like one of Georgia's senators to be on Team Red.
For all the virtues of divided government, I think the GOP needs a purge right now. They need to learn a lesson of loss.

If they'd been slaughtered in House and state races, I'd be OK with them keeping 51 Senate seats to check Biden. But they weren't slaughtered. So they need to keep getting kicked in the teeth.
"saying 'socialism' where normies can hear it is wrapping a bunch of barbed wire around a bat, handing the bat to the GOP, and standing with your head in the strike zone."
--Lunchstealer
User avatar
Aresen
Posts: 17457
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 20:18
Location: Great White Pacific Northwest

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Aresen »

Team thoreau. Especially wrt McConnell.
If Trump supporters wanted a tough guy, why did they elect such a whiny bitch? - Mo

Those who know history are doomed to deja vu. - the innominate one

Never bring a knife to a joke fight" - dhex
User avatar
Shem
Posts: 8646
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 00:27

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Shem »

D.A. Ridgely wrote: 21 Nov 2020, 20:39 Mmmm... I'd kinda like one of Georgia's senators to be on Team Red.
With McConnell in charge of the Senate, that would mean literally nothing getting done until 2022 at least. This is the guy who wouldn't even let a wildly popular Covid relief bill that was supported by the leader of his party come to a vote, even though it might well have enabled his party to hold the Presidency. Since all the relief from before is about to run out, that'd essentially mean years to recover from this recession.
"VOTE SHEMOCRACY! You will only have to do it once!" -Loyalty Officer Aresen
User avatar
Aresen
Posts: 17457
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 20:18
Location: Great White Pacific Northwest

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Aresen »

Perhaps there is some aspect of US election law that I don't get, but I think the Team Blue fury at Emily Murphy is misplaced.

Yes, Ms. Murphy is supposed to sign the letter authorizing release of the transition funds to the Biden team once he has been declared the President-Elect. However, AFAICT, Ms. Murphy has no legal right to make that determination. Essentially, someone else has to tell her that Joe Biden will be the next POTUS. The incumbent president may concede or otherwise tell her to sign the letter or she has to wait until the Electoral College votes are certified on January 6th. All the pundits, media reports, or other third parties have no legal standing to do so.

So the pundits need to back off and focus on the real problem, which is Trump himself. Comparing Ms. Murphy to a Nazi Party functionary, as Ann Applebaum does in the linked article, is not only unproductive, it is demanding that a bureaucrat exceed their authority and act on their own initiative outside of their legal mandate.
If Trump supporters wanted a tough guy, why did they elect such a whiny bitch? - Mo

Those who know history are doomed to deja vu. - the innominate one

Never bring a knife to a joke fight" - dhex
User avatar
Jadagul
Posts: 7654
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 18:51

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Jadagul »

Aresen wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 14:41 Perhaps there is some aspect of US election law that I don't get, but I think the Team Blue fury at Emily Murphy is misplaced.

Yes, Ms. Murphy is supposed to sign the letter authorizing release of the transition funds to the Biden team once he has been declared the President-Elect. However, AFAICT, Ms. Murphy has no legal right to make that determination. Essentially, someone else has to tell her that Joe Biden will be the next POTUS. The incumbent president may concede or otherwise tell her to sign the letter or she has to wait until the Electoral College votes are certified on January 6th. All the pundits, media reports, or other third parties have no legal standing to do so.

So the pundits need to back off and focus on the real problem, which is Trump himself. Comparing Ms. Murphy to a Nazi Party functionary, as Ann Applebaum does in the linked article, is not only unproductive, it is demanding that a bureaucrat exceed their authority and act on their own initiative outside of their legal mandate.
Legally speaking, this is wrong. The statute gives the GSA the authority to ascertain the apparent winner of the election and unlock transition funds.

User avatar
Aresen
Posts: 17457
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 20:18
Location: Great White Pacific Northwest

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Aresen »

Jadagul wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 15:51
Aresen wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 14:41 Perhaps there is some aspect of US election law that I don't get, but I think the Team Blue fury at Emily Murphy is misplaced.

Yes, Ms. Murphy is supposed to sign the letter authorizing release of the transition funds to the Biden team once he has been declared the President-Elect. However, AFAICT, Ms. Murphy has no legal right to make that determination. Essentially, someone else has to tell her that Joe Biden will be the next POTUS. The incumbent president may concede or otherwise tell her to sign the letter or she has to wait until the Electoral College votes are certified on January 6th. All the pundits, media reports, or other third parties have no legal standing to do so.

So the pundits need to back off and focus on the real problem, which is Trump himself. Comparing Ms. Murphy to a Nazi Party functionary, as Ann Applebaum does in the linked article, is not only unproductive, it is demanding that a bureaucrat exceed their authority and act on their own initiative outside of their legal mandate.
Legally speaking, this is wrong. The statute gives the GSA the authority to ascertain the apparent winner of the election and unlock transition funds.

OK. That's the piece I was missing. I assumed there had to be some outside determination that was provided. TBS, I'm not particularly fond of such power being delegated to a bureaucrat. What happens in 2024 if Pence and Harris are tied at 270? Or if the GOP denies Trump the nomination in 2024, but he runs as an independent and no candidate is even close to 270?
If Trump supporters wanted a tough guy, why did they elect such a whiny bitch? - Mo

Those who know history are doomed to deja vu. - the innominate one

Never bring a knife to a joke fight" - dhex
User avatar
Hugh Akston
Posts: 19843
Joined: 05 May 2010, 15:51
Location: Elev. 5280 ft

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Hugh Akston »

Aresen wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 16:22 OK. That's the piece I was missing. I assumed there had to be some outside determination that was provided. TBS, I'm not particularly fond of such power being delegated to a bureaucrat. What happens in 2024 if Pence and Harris are tied at 270? Or if the GOP denies Trump the nomination in 2024, but he runs as an independent and no candidate is even close to 270?
In cases where the outcome is disputed, the GSA administrator can wait until the electors are certified, but in clear-cut outcomes, they can just go ahead without waiting. That's why this kind of discretion is usually fine. But it depends on everyone acting in good faith.
"Is a Lulztopia the best we can hope for?!?" ~Taktix®
"Somali pirates are beholden to their hostages in a way that the USG is not." ~Dangerman
User avatar
Shem
Posts: 8646
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 00:27

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Shem »

Aresen wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 16:22
Jadagul wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 15:51
Aresen wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 14:41 Perhaps there is some aspect of US election law that I don't get, but I think the Team Blue fury at Emily Murphy is misplaced.

Yes, Ms. Murphy is supposed to sign the letter authorizing release of the transition funds to the Biden team once he has been declared the President-Elect. However, AFAICT, Ms. Murphy has no legal right to make that determination. Essentially, someone else has to tell her that Joe Biden will be the next POTUS. The incumbent president may concede or otherwise tell her to sign the letter or she has to wait until the Electoral College votes are certified on January 6th. All the pundits, media reports, or other third parties have no legal standing to do so.

So the pundits need to back off and focus on the real problem, which is Trump himself. Comparing Ms. Murphy to a Nazi Party functionary, as Ann Applebaum does in the linked article, is not only unproductive, it is demanding that a bureaucrat exceed their authority and act on their own initiative outside of their legal mandate.
Legally speaking, this is wrong. The statute gives the GSA the authority to ascertain the apparent winner of the election and unlock transition funds.

OK. That's the piece I was missing. I assumed there had to be some outside determination that was provided. TBS, I'm not particularly fond of such power being delegated to a bureaucrat. What happens in 2024 if Pence and Harris are tied at 270? Or if the GOP denies Trump the nomination in 2024, but he runs as an independent and no candidate is even close to 270?
The statute actually sets out examples of what would constitute suitable evidence of someone's status as President-elect. Many of which Biden has already met, and which a disputed candidate wouldn't.
"VOTE SHEMOCRACY! You will only have to do it once!" -Loyalty Officer Aresen
User avatar
Jadagul
Posts: 7654
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 18:51

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Jadagul »

Hugh Akston wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 16:27
Aresen wrote: 23 Nov 2020, 16:22 OK. That's the piece I was missing. I assumed there had to be some outside determination that was provided. TBS, I'm not particularly fond of such power being delegated to a bureaucrat. What happens in 2024 if Pence and Harris are tied at 270? Or if the GOP denies Trump the nomination in 2024, but he runs as an independent and no candidate is even close to 270?
In cases where the outcome is disputed, the GSA administrator can wait until the electors are certified, but in clear-cut outcomes, they can just go ahead without waiting. That's why this kind of discretion is usually fine. But it depends on everyone acting in good faith.
Yeah, like, the GSA doesn't have authority to determine who _wins_. Regardless of what the GSA does, the electoral college will vote and then Biden will be elected president.

The point is to allow funds and transition supplies to start acting before the electoral college votes. Because it's generally clear who will be president a month before the electoral college votes, and you'd like to support them beginning the transition immediately.

(In 2000, the assessment wasn't made until early December, I think, because things were actually unclear. The 9/11 commission report thinks that is partially why the incoming administration missed the signs of the attack: the transition was delayed a month and therefore much less smooth than it could have been.)
User avatar
JD
Posts: 12324
Joined: 05 May 2010, 15:26

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by JD »

2020 has been a real shit ice cream show.
Wisconsin election observers in Milwaukee were given wristbands bearing the poop emoji Tuesday during the fifth day of watching the recount requested by President Trump’s campaign.
..
Milwaukee County Clerk George Christenson told reporters that he didn't understand the controversy surrounding the wristband Tuesday.

"I always thought it was chocolate ice cream, personally," he said.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watc ... wristbands
I sort of feel like a sucker about aspiring to be intellectually rigorous when I could just go on twitter and say capitalism causes space herpes and no one will challenge me on it. - Hugh Akston
User avatar
Shem
Posts: 8646
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 00:27

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Shem »

I have to say "we hit Dow 30,000 but Trump had to lose for it to happen" has to have involved some money-paw wish shit somewhere.
"VOTE SHEMOCRACY! You will only have to do it once!" -Loyalty Officer Aresen
User avatar
Aresen
Posts: 17457
Joined: 26 Apr 2010, 20:18
Location: Great White Pacific Northwest

Re: Calling 2020 for Entropy

Post by Aresen »

Shem wrote: 24 Nov 2020, 17:12 I have to say "we hit Dow 30,000 but Trump had to lose for it to happen" has to have involved some money-paw wish shit somewhere.
I think it was more relief at the situation being resolved than anything else.

TBS, the present stock market feels like 1999 all over again. ETA: I wish Mo would drop by to put in his 2¢.
If Trump supporters wanted a tough guy, why did they elect such a whiny bitch? - Mo

Those who know history are doomed to deja vu. - the innominate one

Never bring a knife to a joke fight" - dhex
Post Reply